Each article is reviewed by two or three reviewers. In exceptional circumstances, it can be reviewed by one. This allows us to maintain the quality of its content. The reviewer should hold a minimum of a Master’s degree from a recognised university.
The reviewer should advise us whether the article is suitable for publication after minor changes. That is, whether the article is well written and can add value to the reader. Or whether major changes should be implemented before publication. In this last option, the author can resubmit the article for a subsequent review until the reviewers are satisfied with the changes implemented. A paper can also be outright rejected if deemed so by all the reviewers and managing editor.
Our reviewers are acknowledged on the article we publish. The author(s) can also liaise with the reviewers for more insights into a comment and/or suggestion they have made during the review process.
The language of the review is English. When a paper is finally accepted by the reviewers and managing editor, it is editedby our language editor before it can be published.
The reviewer’s suggestions should add value and quality to the article. Reviewers are encouraged to provide only constructive criticism on articles.
“We can no longer continue to make policies for ourselves, our countries, our region and our continent on the basis of whatever the westerners will give us. It will not work, it has not worked...Our responsibility is to charter a path which is about how we can develop our nations ourselves.”
“only a crisis – actual or perceived – produces real change. When that crisis occurs, the actions that are taken depend on the ideas that are lying around. That is our basic function: to develop alternatives to existing policies, to keep them alive until the politically impossible becomes the politically inevitable.”
“The society that puts equality before freedom will end up with neither. The society that puts freedom before equality will end up with a great measure of both.”
“Basic institutions that protect the liberty of individuals to pursue their own economic interests result in greater prosperity for the larger society.”
“...where effective competition can be created, it is a better way of guiding individualefforts than any other... regards competition as superior not only because it is in mostcircumstances the most efficient method known but even more because it is the only methodby which our activities can be adjusted to each other without coercive or arbitraryintervention of authority.”
"The fundamental cure for poverty is not money but knowledge."